Expand the introduction
This commit is contained in:
32
README.md
32
README.md
@@ -1,11 +1,33 @@
|
||||
Scientific publishing is broken.
|
||||
# Sivu: Scientific publishing as it should be
|
||||
|
||||
Universities spend every year x dollars to publishing houses without getting anything in return, while the publishing houses extract similar profits as Meta; peer-review is slow and prone to corruption; papers are unreproducible and…
|
||||
Scientific publishing is broken.
|
||||
|
||||
Universities worldwide pay over $2.5B every year to the six biggest publishing houses just to get their articles published [(1)](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.16551). This means that -- after funding the actual research work -- publicly funded research institutions pay on average $2,044 for each open access article just to get the results published [(2)](https://github.com/OpenAPC/openapc-de?tab=readme-ov-file). At the same time it is impossible to say what is it exactly that universities get in return for this spending. The only meaningful output in the publication process is peer-review which is currently performed by researches themselves -- free of charge. Meanwhile, the publishing houses produce nothing else but money to their owners with profit margins close to 40 % which aligns with companies such as Google and Microsoft [(3)](https://tidsskriftet.no/en/2020/08/kronikk/money-behind-academic-publishing).
|
||||
|
||||
It does not have to be this way.
|
||||
|
||||
[[Sivu]] removes publishing houses from the equation. At its’ core it is a git server because as it happens, git provides all the most important features high-quality yet affordable science requires: traceability, easy collaboration, transpatent workflows and end-to-end reproducibilty.
|
||||
We the researches have all the power to simply remove the publishing houses from the equation. We should start publishing open science like open source software is published: using a git server. Git provides all the features high-quality science requires: traceability, easy collaboration, transpatent workflows and end-to-end reproducibilty.
|
||||
|
||||
Sivu is built from scientists. To be used by scientists. To benefit everyone. So join the movement by creating an account, create your first repository and start publishing today.
|
||||
Sivu is our proposal to fix scientific publishing.
|
||||
|
||||
We are sure you will like it. Because Sivu is scientific publishing as it should be.
|
||||
Sivu is built on a beatiful [Gitea](https://about.gitea.com/) codebase but incrementally adds the features that scientific publishing requires: PDF rendering, DOI assignment, open peer-review and science specific merit tracking. Can you imagine what kind of possibilites for discovery would it unlock, if all the scientific knowledge -- the data, the analysis, the conclusions, the discussion -- could be stored in a standardized and well contained repositories?
|
||||
|
||||
We are learning as we go but a few corner stones will remain: sivu is built from scientists, to be used by scientists, to benefit everyone. We are just getting started but you can already join the movement by creating an account, creating your first repository and start publishing today.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Sincerely yours,
|
||||
|
||||
Sivu core team:
|
||||
|
||||
Jalmari Nevanlinna
|
||||
|
||||
Antti Roine
|
||||
|
||||
Niku Oksala
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
(1) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.16551
|
||||
|
||||
(2) https://github.com/OpenAPC/openapc-de?tab=readme-ov-file
|
||||
|
||||
(3) https://tidsskriftet.no/en/2020/08/kronikk/money-behind-academic-publishing
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user